Search for: "Staples the Office Superstore, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2015, 2:26 pm
The Massachusetts-based company reorganized its business in 1998, creating two entities: Staples Inc., which handles administrative functions such as accounting and human resources; and Staples the Office Superstore Inc., which oversees franchise ... [read post]
23 May 2015, 6:47 am
An Illinois attorney has filed a motion for disbarment by consent on the following admitted facts In 2011, Respondent represented Staples the Office Superstore East (a subsidiary of Staples, Inc.; hereafter, "Staples"), the defendant in a personal injury action filed... [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 9:56 am
(TGT) since Staples Inc. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
Staples the Office Superstore East Inc. 17-1692 Issue: Whether, as the U.S. [read post]
5 May 2010, 10:32 am
Staples invented the office superstore concept in 1986 and today ranks second worldwide in e-commerce sales. [read post]
23 Feb 2015, 6:11 am
A merger of the two leading office superstores, Staples and Office Depot, and the breakup of DuPont Co., each are being promoted by activist investors. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 4:53 pm
Staples of the Offices Superstore, LLC and Estrada v. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 1:52 pm
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC[1], which felt like a breath of fresh air for employers, if not for a brief moment. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
., Serial Nos. 77513758 and 77513717 [Section 2(e)(1) refusals to register A BRAND NAME ADVISOR for "business consultation services, namely, product and marketing evaluation; advertising services, namely, creating corporate and product identity for others; creating trademarks for others" and A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM for "legal services"].June 22, 2011 - 11 AM: In re Prosynthesis Laboratories, Inc., Serial No. 77902555 [Section 2(a) refusal of CHINA FREE and Design for… [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 2:14 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.July 7, 2011 - 11 AM: In re The Government of the District of Columbia, Serial No. 77643857 [Section 2(b) refusal to register the mark shown below for clocks, cufflinks, clothing, and various other goods, on the ground that the mark is an official insignia of the District of Columbia].July 12, 2011 - 11 AM: In re Coach Services, Inc., Serial No. 77606502 [Section 2(d) refusal of the mark POPPY for… [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 3:16 am
Bluebonnet Nutrition Corp., Opposition Nos. 91178358 and 91179048 [Consolidated Section 2(d) oppositions to registration of OPTIMUM ENZYMES and OPTIMUM C-1000MG for nutritional supplements, in view of the registered mark OPTIMUM for vitamins and supplements].October 27, 2010 - 10 AM: In re Eddie Bauer, Inc., Serial No. 77411442 [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark YUKON CLASSIC for backpacks and clothing [CLASSIC disclaimed] in light of the registered mark YUKON for footwear,… [read post]
20 Jul 2022, 6:15 am
Staples The Office Superstore, LLC (2021) 68 Cal.App.5th 746, previously the only published California appellate decision addressing this issue. [read post]
5 May 2022, 9:18 am
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
7 Apr 2022, 4:44 pm
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
California Supreme Court Holds That Trial Courts May Not Strike PAGA Claims on Manageability Grounds
18 Jan 2024, 11:35 am
Staples the Office Superstore, LLC, 68 Cal. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 2:36 am
Thread Pit, Inc., Cancellation No. 92047436 [Petition for cancellation of a registration for the mark shown below for "wearing apparel, namely, jackets, sweatshirts, sweat pants, hats, scarves, jerseys, jeans, turtlenecks, and bikinis," on the grounds of likelihood of confusion with, and likely dilution of, Petitioner's allegedly-famous "polo player" design mark, for various clothing items].October 25, 2011 - 2 PM: In re Staples The Office… [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 6:39 pm
Staples of the Offices Superstore, LLC and Estrada v. [read post]
8 Jan 2009, 12:53 pm
Whole Foods Market, Inc., D.C. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 5:42 am
Nor did Fuhrmann v Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc,which the district court relied on, bar the employee’s claim as it never mentioned Section 4633 and assessed only whether the legislature intended to allow suits against individual supervisors, not what it intended about suits against non-employer third parties. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 12:05 am
Early in 2016, the FTC achieved an important court victory, when it successfully blocked the proposed merger between office supply superstore operators Staples and Office Depot. [read post]
